Page 1 of 1
Poll: Who is scarier?
Posted: 26 May 2005, 08:10
by PanzerMeyer
Vote now!
Sorry guys! EDITED: Kat
OR
Posted: 26 May 2005, 11:43
by Jedi Master
If you're a male under age 13, #2. Otherwise, #1. I mean, there ARE fates worse than death.
Posted: 26 May 2005, 12:00
by KODIAK
Okay, what am I NOT seeing here? There is only ONE scarey thing there no matter what your age OR sexual orientation. :lol:
Posted: 27 May 2005, 07:53
by KODIAK
Kat, you party pooper! :lol:
Posted: 27 May 2005, 10:57
by Softball
Katana wrote:Guys - remember WOF is a family group and has several members under the legal age. 2 of which are mine & Raptor's kids which can freely browse the WOF GENERAL FORUM sections....
If that is the case, why did you leave up the Michael Jackson photo? :shock:
Posted: 27 May 2005, 11:13
by PanzerMeyer
Ok. So I take it Michael Jackson is scarier than Osama?
:shock:
Posted: 27 May 2005, 11:57
by KODIAK
You know SB, you DO have a point there. And Panz, depending on your perspective - yes he is! :lol:
Posted: 27 May 2005, 16:38
by Grifter
Maybe I'm missing something here. you sure you posted the right pic Panz? I saw a woman in a provocative photo. shrug?
Posted: 27 May 2005, 16:41
by PanzerMeyer
Grifter wrote:Maybe I'm missing something here. you sure you posted the right pic Panz? I saw a woman in a provocative photo. shrug?
Huh? Um..no. I posted a black & white pic of Osama bin Laden. I got it via a Google search.
Edit: Oh, no. I know what happened. I copy and pasted the link from the Google search page but I never actually bothered to click on the image to see which web page it came from. When I did that, it took me to the webpage and apparently the picture linked to that URL was changed. I guess Google had an outdated link.
Sorry about that.
Here is what I'm talking about:
http://images.google.com/images?q=osama+bin+laden&hl=en
Posted: 27 May 2005, 17:58
by Nemisis
I was wondering what the hell was going on when i seen the Girl and Michael Jackson and the question was who is scarier?
Bad link answers my question and i'd have to say Michael to the other one.
Posted: 27 May 2005, 18:02
by KODIAK
Sorry Panz, a plausible excuse in normal circumstances. But for some reason I just can't bring myself to believe a damn word of it! :lol:
Posted: 28 May 2005, 12:51
by Gator
actaully, that does explain it ... i couldn't figure out how that was such a hard call to make ...
Posted: 28 May 2005, 18:02
by Grifter
yeah...ok that makes much more sense. I thought Panzer was starting to lose it.
Posted: 29 May 2005, 04:54
by KODIAK
Well, frankly, I don't think it would matter who's pic you put up there as a comparison. This guy is very much an unknown quantity, who has made great use of his millions to hide some very disturbing truths about his inner personality. And the question is, who knows how dangerous he truely is? Money talks in a big way, and has an innate ability to distort reality beyond comprehension. :shock:
Posted: 31 May 2005, 16:41
by PanzerMeyer
Grifter wrote: I thought Panzer was starting to lose it.
It's too late for me! As Freddy Mercury so wonderfully sang "I'm going slightly mad..It finally happened..It FINALLY happened oh yes." :lol:
Posted: 04 Jun 2005, 04:34
by KODIAK
I think you'll find yourself in good company around here then! :lol: