2nd Amendment Wins
Moderator: RLG MGMT Team
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 17:26
- Location: Wichita KS
2nd Amendment Wins
After some of the other opinions rendered in the past 2 weeks....I was actually worried about the Heller vs. DC case. This ruling affirms the 2nd. I still cant believe we were/are 1 vote away from Marxism but I will take what i can get here.
If your into legal reading.....here is the 157 page decision written by Justice Antonin Scalia.....
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content ... 07-290.pdf
I can just bet the left will cast this as a fractured, divided, activist, ideological lines decision but the 5-4 decision for granting non-affiliated, non-uniformed enemy combatants (i.e. jihadist-terrorists) habeas rights as a monumental, historic, slap in the face of a unpopular administration, the greatest thing since sliced cheese. And that sound you heard was left-wing lawyers stampeding to appeals courts for their Gitmo clients (any thought as to what thats going to cost us taxpayers?)
If your into legal reading.....here is the 157 page decision written by Justice Antonin Scalia.....
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content ... 07-290.pdf
I can just bet the left will cast this as a fractured, divided, activist, ideological lines decision but the 5-4 decision for granting non-affiliated, non-uniformed enemy combatants (i.e. jihadist-terrorists) habeas rights as a monumental, historic, slap in the face of a unpopular administration, the greatest thing since sliced cheese. And that sound you heard was left-wing lawyers stampeding to appeals courts for their Gitmo clients (any thought as to what thats going to cost us taxpayers?)
Last edited by Buffalo Six on 26 Jun 2008, 09:03, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 17:26
- Location: Wichita KS
FFS Veg I provided a dang link.........
for those like Veg who are too lazy to actually look it up.......
Answering a 127-year old constitutional question, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to have a gun, at least in one’s home. The Court, splitting 5-4, struck down a District of Columbia ban on handgun possession.
for those like Veg who are too lazy to actually look it up.......
Answering a 127-year old constitutional question, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to have a gun, at least in one’s home. The Court, splitting 5-4, struck down a District of Columbia ban on handgun possession.
that's like up here in Canada they put in this rather restrictive gun registration system that went way overbudget and such. but who dose it hurt, um people who are honest and want to be good with the law. If I want to shoot someone guess what, I am going to steal or black marker buy a gun that can't be traced to me. Same crap happens in the Us ban something and people still get them. O and canada you can't have hand guns at all, but guess what is used in most shooting, you get 3 guesses and if you need more then 1 um ya you be dumb. Don't mind not being allowed to have hand guns but it hurts the valid legal people.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 17:26
- Location: Wichita KS